Colombia vs Tunisia: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Colombia
345,630 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
329,054 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
107th
Tunisia rank
110th

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 345,630 current US$ per square kilometre against 329,054 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 16,576 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tunisia ahead.

Colombia ranks 107th and Tunisia ranks 110th of 183 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 5,329 current US$ per square kilometre 6,669 current US$ per square kilometre 1,340 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 12,905 current US$ per square kilometre 25,801 current US$ per square kilometre 12,897 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 33,154 current US$ per square kilometre 60,796 current US$ per square kilometre 27,642 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 73,272 current US$ per square kilometre 116,450 current US$ per square kilometre 43,179 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 139,029 current US$ per square kilometre 210,794 current US$ per square kilometre 71,765 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 308,786 current US$ per square kilometre 323,171 current US$ per square kilometre 14,385 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 312,594 current US$ per square kilometre 321,748 current US$ per square kilometre 9,153 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Colombia or Tunisia?
Colombia, at 345,630 current US$ per square kilometre against 329,054 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Colombia and Tunisia?
16,576 current US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Tunisia rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 107th and Tunisia ranks 110th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tunisia: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/tunisia/">Colombia vs Tunisia: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.