Botswana vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
34,945 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
31,619 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
162nd
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
164th

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 34,945 current US$ per square kilometre against 31,619 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 3,326 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 162nd and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 164th of 183 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo, Democratic Republic of the Difference Ahead
1990s 7,874 current US$ per square kilometre 2,463 current US$ per square kilometre 5,411 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 13,749 current US$ per square kilometre 6,545 current US$ per square kilometre 7,204 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 27,106 current US$ per square kilometre 16,903 current US$ per square kilometre 10,203 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 33,490 current US$ per square kilometre 27,709 current US$ per square kilometre 5,781 current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
Botswana, at 34,945 current US$ per square kilometre against 31,619 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
3,326 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 162nd and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 164th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-dem-rep/">Botswana vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.