Bangladesh vs Portugal: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
3.15 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
34th
Portugal rank
36th

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Portugal
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.15 million current US$ per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 386,350 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Portugal ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 34th and Portugal ranks 36th of 183 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 92,869 current US$ per square kilometre 206,833 current US$ per square kilometre 113,964 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 172,528 current US$ per square kilometre 448,812 current US$ per square kilometre 276,285 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 315,776 current US$ per square kilometre 1.27 million current US$ per square kilometre 955,611 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 566,065 current US$ per square kilometre 2.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.66 million current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 1.72 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.49 million current US$ per square kilometre 771,504 current US$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 3.42 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.86 million current US$ per square kilometre 558,148 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Portugal?
Bangladesh, at 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.15 million current US$ per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Portugal?
386,350 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Portugal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Portugal rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 34th and Portugal ranks 36th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Portugal: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/portugal/">Bangladesh vs Portugal: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.