Bangladesh vs Cyprus: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus
3.72 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
34th
Cyprus rank
33rd

Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cyprus
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 3.72 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 178,680 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 34th and Cyprus ranks 33rd of 183 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Cyprus in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cyprus Difference Ahead
1970s 113,270 current US$ per square kilometre 106,869 current US$ per square kilometre 6,401 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 172,528 current US$ per square kilometre 337,594 current US$ per square kilometre 165,066 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 315,776 current US$ per square kilometre 908,883 current US$ per square kilometre 593,107 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 566,065 current US$ per square kilometre 2.01 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.45 million current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 1.72 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.63 million current US$ per square kilometre 908,522 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 3.42 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.23 million current US$ per square kilometre 193,592 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Cyprus?
Cyprus, at 3.72 million current US$ per square kilometre against 3.54 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Cyprus?
178,680 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cyprus?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Cyprus rank globally for gross national expenditure (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 34th and Cyprus ranks 33rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Cyprus: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/cyprus/">Bangladesh vs Cyprus: Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.