Late-demographic dividend vs Philippines: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Late-demographic dividend
0.8664 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Philippines
1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
26th
Philippines rank
28th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Philippines
02468196019922025

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8664 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1836 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Philippines ranks 28th of 41 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 1.64 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.59 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0547 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2000s 1.49 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.63 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1413 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Philippines
2010s 0.9321 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.08 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1442 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Philippines
2020s 0.8899 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.06 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.171 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Late-demographic dividend or Philippines?
Philippines, at 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8664 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Late-demographic dividend and Philippines?
0.1836 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Philippines?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Philippines rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Philippines ranks 28th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Philippines: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/philippines/">Late-demographic dividend vs Philippines: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,398 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.