Late-demographic dividend vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Late-demographic dividend
0.8664 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mauritania
1.09 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
26th
Mauritania rank
23rd

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Mauritania
12345196419942025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 1.09 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8664 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.2236 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Mauritania ranks 23rd of 41 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s 1.64 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.59 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.056 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2000s 1.49 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.72 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2305 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2010s 0.9321 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.11 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1751 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania
2020s 0.8899 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2336 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Late-demographic dividend or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 1.09 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8664 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Late-demographic dividend and Mauritania?
0.2236 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Mauritania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Mauritania rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Mauritania ranks 23rd of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/mauritania/">Late-demographic dividend vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,398 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.