Kiribati vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Kiribati
1.64 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Kiribati rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
6th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Kiribati
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
00.511.52200220132025

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 1.64 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.52 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 6th of 163 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 1.8 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.11 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6829 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Kiribati
2010s 1.56 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5446 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Kiribati
2020s 1.68 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6265 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Kiribati or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Kiribati, at 1.64 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Kiribati and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.52 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Kiribati ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 6th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/kiribati/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/kiribati/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Kiribati vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,398 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.