Central Europe and the Baltics vs Rwanda: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.6187 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.9745 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
41st
Rwanda rank
38th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Rwanda
0246196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.9745 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6187 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.3558 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 41st and Rwanda ranks 38th of 41 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 1.78 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.25 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5306 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 1.31 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.43 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1201 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.8832 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2162 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.7536 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2564 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Central Europe and the Baltics or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.9745 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6187 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Central Europe and the Baltics and Rwanda?
0.3558 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Rwanda?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Rwanda rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 41st and Rwanda ranks 38th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Rwanda: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/rwanda/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Rwanda: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,398 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.