Central Europe and the Baltics vs Korea: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.6187 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Korea
0.9523 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
41st
Korea rank
42nd

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Korea
051015196019922025

How they compare

Korea currently reports 0.9523 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6187 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.3336 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 41st and Korea ranks 42nd of 41 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 2 and Korea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 1.78 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.41 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3687 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 1.31 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.25 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0652 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 0.8832 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.951 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0679 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Korea
2020s 0.7536 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9379 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1843 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Central Europe and the Baltics or Korea?
Korea, at 0.9523 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6187 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Central Europe and the Baltics and Korea?
0.3336 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Korea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Korea rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 41st and Korea ranks 42nd of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Korea: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/korea-rep/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Korea: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,398 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.