How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and IBRD only?

30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs IBRD only: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Botswana

1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

IBRD only

0.8874 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Botswana rank

27th

IBRD only rank

25th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Botswana
IBRD only

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8874 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in IBRD only, a difference of 0.1626 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was IBRD only ahead.

Botswana ranks 27th and IBRD only ranks 25th of 163 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and IBRD only in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	IBRD only	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.03 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.64 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.6112 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	IBRD only
2000s	0.8647 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	1.38 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.516 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	IBRD only
2010s	0.9344 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9535 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0191 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	IBRD only
2020s	1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.9219 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0798 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Botswana or IBRD only?: Botswana, at 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8874 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in IBRD only as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Botswana and IBRD only?: 0.1626 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and IBRD only?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Botswana and IBRD only rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Botswana ranks 27th and IBRD only ranks 25th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs IBRD only: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/ibrd-only/">Botswana vs IBRD only: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 204 places, 8,398 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 08 September 2026

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.