Bangladesh vs Puerto Rico: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Bangladesh
0.8072 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Puerto Rico
0.8101 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
98th
Puerto Rico rank
97th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Puerto Rico
02468196019922025

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.8101 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8072 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 98th and Puerto Rico ranks 97th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 6 and Puerto Rico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 6.59 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 6.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.534 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
1970s 4.38 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 4.37 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0162 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
1980s 2.48 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.99 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.481 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
1990s 1.91 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.42 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4974 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
2000s 1.67 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6195 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
2010s 1.06 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8023 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2571 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bangladesh
2020s 0.7604 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.821 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0606 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Bangladesh or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0.8101 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8072 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Bangladesh and Puerto Rico?
0.0029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Puerto Rico?
62 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Puerto Rico rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Bangladesh ranks 98th and Puerto Rico ranks 97th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Puerto Rico: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/puerto-rico-us/">Bangladesh vs Puerto Rico: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,398 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.