Angola vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Angola
1.37 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Angola rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
6th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Angola
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.511.522.53200220132025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 1.37 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.25 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 6th of 163 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 1.61 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.38 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2317 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Angola
2010s 1.02 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Angola
2020s 1.36 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3128 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Angola or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Angola, at 1.37 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.25 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Angola ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 6th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Angola vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,398 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.