How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Uganda?

26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Oman vs Uganda: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Oman

265,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Uganda

257,872 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Oman rank

102nd

Uganda rank

104th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

Oman
Uganda

How they compare

Oman currently reports 265,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 257,872 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 8,121 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.

Oman ranks 102nd and Uganda ranks 104th of 160 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Oman	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	86,304 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	66,461 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	19,843 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Oman
2000s	120,124 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	93,062 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	27,061 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Oman
2010s	233,622 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	173,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	60,453 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Oman
2020s	257,444 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	241,676 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	15,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Oman or Uganda?: Oman, at 265,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 257,872 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Oman and Uganda?: 8,121 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Uganda?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Oman and Uganda rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?: Oman ranks 102nd and Uganda ranks 104th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Uganda: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/uganda/">Oman vs Uganda: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 08 September 2026

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.