North Macedonia vs Pakistan: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

North Macedonia
541,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
589,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
78th
Pakistan rank
75th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Pakistan
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k198620042023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 589,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 541,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 47,845 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 78th and Pakistan ranks 75th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 237,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 204,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,813 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 332,069 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 290,221 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 41,847 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 455,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 424,631 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,371 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 533,133 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 565,274 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,141 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, North Macedonia or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 589,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 541,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between North Macedonia and Pakistan?
47,845 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Pakistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do North Macedonia and Pakistan rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
North Macedonia ranks 78th and Pakistan ranks 75th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Pakistan: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/pakistan/">North Macedonia vs Pakistan: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.