Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Montenegro
518,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
488,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro rank
80th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
82nd

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Montenegro
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200620142023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 518,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 488,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 29,584 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Montenegro ahead.

Montenegro ranks 80th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 82nd of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 376,708 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 321,258 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,450 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 375,709 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 410,955 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 467,382 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 487,459 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,077 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Montenegro or Sao Tome and Principe?
Montenegro, at 518,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 488,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
29,584 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Montenegro ranks 80th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 82nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/sao-tome-and-principe/">Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.