Malaysia vs Norway: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Malaysia
1.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
54th
Norway rank
53rd

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malaysia
  • Norway
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 9,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 54th and Norway ranks 53rd of 160 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 77,533 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 344,978 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 267,445 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 148,725 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 449,714 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 300,989 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 297,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 541,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 243,102 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 449,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 767,338 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 317,444 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 825,472 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.02 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 190,579 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 1.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 69,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Malaysia or Norway?
Norway, at 1.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Malaysia and Norway?
9,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Norway rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Malaysia ranks 54th and Norway ranks 53rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Norway: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/norway/">Malaysia vs Norway: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.