Kazakhstan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
86,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
83,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
134th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
135th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199020062023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 86,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 83,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 2,611 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 134th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th of 160 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 21,969 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,725 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 29,813 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,044 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 768.79 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 60,621 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,634 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,987 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 78,580 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 77,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 845.62 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Kazakhstan, at 86,552 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 83,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2,611 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 134th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/tanzania/">Kazakhstan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.