IDA & IBRD total vs Mauritius: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

IDA & IBRD total
402,049 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
6.91 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total rank
22nd
Mauritius rank
20th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Mauritius
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M197619992023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 6.91 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 402,049 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 6.51 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 17.2 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 22nd and Mauritius ranks 20th of 41 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 105,400 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 154,864 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.54 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.39 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 290,304 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.07 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 374,614 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, IDA & IBRD total or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 6.91 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 402,049 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between IDA & IBRD total and Mauritius?
6.51 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Mauritius?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Mauritius rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 22nd and Mauritius ranks 20th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Mauritius: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/mauritius/">IDA & IBRD total vs Mauritius: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.