Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
445,881 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
488,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
85th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
82nd

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sao Tome and Principe
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 488,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 445,881 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 42,537 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 85th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 82nd of 160 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 288,924 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 321,258 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,334 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 385,141 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 410,955 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 416,618 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 487,459 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 70,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 488,418 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 445,881 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
42,537 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 85th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 82nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sao-tome-and-principe/">Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.