East Asia & Pacific vs Luxembourg: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
1.22 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Luxembourg
18.95 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
9th
Luxembourg rank
8th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Luxembourg
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199520092023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 18.95 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.22 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 17.73 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 15.5 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 8th of 41 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 482,092 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11.44 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 876,628 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15.51 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14.63 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg
2020s 1.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 18.95 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.22 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg?
17.73 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 8th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Luxembourg: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/luxembourg/">East Asia & Pacific vs Luxembourg: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.