Dominican Republic vs Poland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Dominican Republic
2.24 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
1.96 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
37th
Poland rank
40th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Poland
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 2.24 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.96 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 278,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Poland ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 37th and Poland ranks 40th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 663,103 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 817,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 154,685 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 936,905 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.10 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 159,116 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 1.52 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.54 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,931 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 2.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.92 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 158,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Dominican Republic or Poland?
Dominican Republic, at 2.24 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.96 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Dominican Republic and Poland?
278,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Poland?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Poland rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 37th and Poland ranks 40th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Poland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/poland/">Dominican Republic vs Poland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.