Denmark vs IDA & IBRD total: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
8.00 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total
402,049 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
19th
IDA & IBRD total rank
22nd

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • IDA & IBRD total
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196619942023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 8.00 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 402,049 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 7.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 19.9 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 19th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 22nd of 160 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark IDA & IBRD total Difference Ahead
1990s 5.46 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 105,400 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5.35 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 6.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 154,864 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 7.08 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 290,304 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6.79 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 8.10 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 374,614 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7.73 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or IDA & IBRD total?
Denmark, at 8.00 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 402,049 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and IDA & IBRD total?
7.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IDA & IBRD total?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Denmark and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 19th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 22nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs IDA & IBRD total: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Denmark vs IDA & IBRD total: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.