Cuba vs New Zealand: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Cuba
816,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
873,795 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
62nd
New Zealand rank
59th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • New Zealand
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 873,795 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 816,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 57,302 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 62nd and New Zealand ranks 59th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 317,644 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 245,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 72,402 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 522,446 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 278,340 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 244,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 416,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 342,645 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 73,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 542,988 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 497,277 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 45,712 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 786,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 668,423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 118,312 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 817,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 855,123 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Cuba or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 873,795 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 816,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Cuba and New Zealand?
57,302 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and New Zealand rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 62nd and New Zealand ranks 59th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Zealand: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/new-zealand/">Cuba vs New Zealand: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.