Cuba vs Finland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Cuba
816,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
828,787 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
62nd
Finland rank
61st

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Finland
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 828,787 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 816,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 12,294 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Cuba ranks 62nd and Finland ranks 61st of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Finland Difference Ahead
1970s 317,644 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 328,888 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 522,446 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 451,682 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 70,764 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 416,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 523,980 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 107,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 542,988 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 695,132 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 152,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 786,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 786,785 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49.5 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 817,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 834,957 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,747 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Cuba or Finland?
Finland, at 828,787 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 816,493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Cuba and Finland?
12,294 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 62nd and Finland ranks 61st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Finland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/finland/">Cuba vs Finland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.