Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Somalia: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
26,064 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
22,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
149th
Somalia rank
152nd

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Somalia
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199320082023

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 26,064 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 22,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Somalia, a difference of 4,064 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.2 times Somalia's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the has been ahead every year.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 149th and Somalia ranks 152nd of 160 countries.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Somalia Difference Ahead
2010s 18,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,414 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,301 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 23,862 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,033 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,829 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Somalia?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 26,064 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 22,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Somalia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Somalia?
4,064 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Somalia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Somalia rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 149th and Somalia ranks 152nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Somalia: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/somalia-fed-rep/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Somalia: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.