Chile vs Republic of Moldova: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
396,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Republic of Moldova
357,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
88th
Republic of Moldova rank
91st

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Republic of Moldova
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 396,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 357,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 38,509 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Chile ranks 88th and Republic of Moldova ranks 91st of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Republic of Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 136,813 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 135,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,573 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 193,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 203,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,778 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Republic of Moldova
2010s 325,561 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 302,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,908 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 385,550 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 359,633 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Republic of Moldova?
Chile, at 396,405 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 357,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Republic of Moldova?
38,509 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Republic of Moldova?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Chile and Republic of Moldova rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 88th and Republic of Moldova ranks 91st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Republic of Moldova: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/moldova/">Chile vs Republic of Moldova: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.