Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
1.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
48.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th
Malta rank
4th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M199520092023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 48.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 46.75 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 33.2 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 4th of 41 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 911,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22.41 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 1.15 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30.62 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29.47 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 1.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 44.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42.64 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Malta?
Malta, at 48.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
46.75 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 4th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.