Canada vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Canada
213,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
224,674 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
111th
Iceland rank
108th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • Iceland
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 224,674 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 213,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 11,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 111th and Iceland ranks 108th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 61,663 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,259 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 81,312 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84,272 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 101,076 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 103,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,630 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 139,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 156,024 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 178,302 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 163,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,357 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Canada
2020s 202,252 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 209,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,935 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Canada or Iceland?
Iceland, at 224,674 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 213,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Canada and Iceland?
11,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Canada and Iceland rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 111th and Iceland ranks 108th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/iceland/">Canada vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.