Brazil vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
231,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
224,674 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
107th
Iceland rank
108th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Iceland
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k197019962023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 231,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 224,674 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 6,394 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 107th and Iceland ranks 108th of 160 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 70,460 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,259 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 99,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84,272 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,302 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 124,765 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 103,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,059 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 161,286 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 156,024 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,262 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 218,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 163,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 54,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 222,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 209,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,754 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Iceland?
Brazil, at 231,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 224,674 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Iceland?
6,394 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Iceland rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 107th and Iceland ranks 108th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iceland/">Brazil vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.