Botswana vs Congo: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
33,763 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
27,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
146th
Congo rank
148th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 33,763 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 27,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 5,830 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Congo ahead.

Botswana ranks 146th and Congo ranks 148th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 1,976 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 3,371 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,080 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,709 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 7,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,912 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 12,616 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,980 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 24,683 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,248 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,565 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 31,643 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Congo?
Botswana, at 33,763 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 27,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Congo?
5,830 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 146th and Congo ranks 148th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.