Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Bhutan
83,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
83,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
136th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
135th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199020062023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 83,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 83,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 826 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Bhutan ranks 136th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 13,852 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,034 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,181 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 31,816 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,044 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,772 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 67,556 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,634 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,922 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 78,485 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 77,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 751.1 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 83,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 83,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
826 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 136th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 135th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/tanzania/">Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.