Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Bahamas
1.34 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
1.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
49th
Costa Rica rank
48th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Costa Rica
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.34 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 27,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 49th and Costa Rica ranks 48th of 160 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 4 and Costa Rica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1980s 764,865 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 377,301 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 387,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 820,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 490,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 329,547 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 1.23 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 723,876 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 505,516 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 1.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 122,212 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 1.21 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.29 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 75,988 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 1.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.34 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Costa Rica?
27,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Costa Rica?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Costa Rica rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 49th and Costa Rica ranks 48th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/costa-rica/">Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.