Argentina vs Brazil: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
223,897 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
231,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
109th
Brazil rank
107th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Brazil
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 231,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 223,897 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 7,171 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 109th and Brazil ranks 107th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Brazil Difference Ahead
1970s 83,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 70,460 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,338 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 92,011 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 99,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,563 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 118,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 124,765 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 143,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 161,286 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 213,488 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 218,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,217 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 208,141 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 222,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Brazil?
Brazil, at 231,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 223,897 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Brazil?
7,171 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Brazil?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Brazil rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 109th and Brazil ranks 107th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Brazil: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/brazil/">Argentina vs Brazil: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,891 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.