Early-demographic dividend vs Macau, China: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Early-demographic dividend
4,067 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Macau, China
36,628 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
27th
Macau, China rank
25th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Macau, China
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196019922025

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 36,628 constant 2015 US$ per person against 4,067 constant 2015 US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 32,561 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 9.0 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 27th and Macau, China ranks 25th of 41 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 2,151 constant 2015 US$ per person 16,594 constant 2015 US$ per person 14,443 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China
1990s 2,117 constant 2015 US$ per person 23,079 constant 2015 US$ per person 20,963 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China
2000s 2,186 constant 2015 US$ per person 28,637 constant 2015 US$ per person 26,450 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China
2010s 3,253 constant 2015 US$ per person 39,028 constant 2015 US$ per person 35,775 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China
2020s 3,739 constant 2015 US$ per person 35,213 constant 2015 US$ per person 31,473 constant 2015 US$ per person Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Early-demographic dividend or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 36,628 constant 2015 US$ per person against 4,067 constant 2015 US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Early-demographic dividend and Macau, China?
32,561 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Macau, China?
44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Macau, China rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 27th and Macau, China ranks 25th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Macau, China: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/macao-sar-china/">Early-demographic dividend vs Macau, China: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,409 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.