Early-demographic dividend vs Korea: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Early-demographic dividend
4,067 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Korea
34,500 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
27th
Korea rank
28th

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Korea
010.0k20.0k30.0k196019922025

How they compare

Korea currently reports 34,500 constant 2015 US$ per person against 4,067 constant 2015 US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 30,433 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Korea's figure about 8.5 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 27th and Korea ranks 28th of 41 groups.

Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 1,206 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,868 constant 2015 US$ per person 662.43 constant 2015 US$ per person Korea
1970s 1,679 constant 2015 US$ per person 3,758 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,080 constant 2015 US$ per person Korea
1980s 2,110 constant 2015 US$ per person 6,923 constant 2015 US$ per person 4,813 constant 2015 US$ per person Korea
1990s 2,117 constant 2015 US$ per person 14,579 constant 2015 US$ per person 12,462 constant 2015 US$ per person Korea
2000s 2,186 constant 2015 US$ per person 21,640 constant 2015 US$ per person 19,454 constant 2015 US$ per person Korea
2010s 3,253 constant 2015 US$ per person 28,333 constant 2015 US$ per person 25,080 constant 2015 US$ per person Korea
2020s 3,739 constant 2015 US$ per person 33,450 constant 2015 US$ per person 29,711 constant 2015 US$ per person Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Early-demographic dividend or Korea?
Korea, at 34,500 constant 2015 US$ per person against 4,067 constant 2015 US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Early-demographic dividend and Korea?
30,433 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Korea?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Korea rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 27th and Korea ranks 28th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Korea: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/korea-rep/">Early-demographic dividend vs Korea: Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,409 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.