Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre

Suriname
0.0109 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0096 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
169th
Zimbabwe rank
171st

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0096 million USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.

Suriname ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 194 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre 0.001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0061 million USD per square kilometre 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0118 million USD per square kilometre 0.0055 million USD per square kilometre 0.0063 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0093 million USD per square kilometre 0.0077 million USD per square kilometre 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Suriname, at 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0096 million USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
0.0013 million USD per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.