Russia vs East Timor: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre

Russia
0.0275 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
0.0243 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Russia rank
152nd
East Timor rank
155th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Russia
  • East Timor
00.010.020.030.040.05199020062023

How they compare

Russia currently reports 0.0275 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0243 million USD per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russia ahead.

Russia ranks 152nd and East Timor ranks 155th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russia averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russia East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre 0.009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 0.0106 million USD per square kilometre 0.0093 million USD per square kilometre 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre Russia
2010s 0.0233 million USD per square kilometre 0.0378 million USD per square kilometre 0.0145 million USD per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 0.0242 million USD per square kilometre 0.025 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre, Russia or East Timor?
Russia, at 0.0275 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0243 million USD per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre between Russia and East Timor?
0.0032 million USD per square kilometre, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and East Timor?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russia and East Timor rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre?
Russia ranks 152nd and East Timor ranks 155th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russia vs East Timor: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/russian-federation/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/russian-federation/timor-leste/">Russia vs East Timor: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.