North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre

North Macedonia
0.1551 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.1581 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia rank
93rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
91st

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.050.10.150.2197019962023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.1581 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1551 million USD per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.003 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 93rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 91st of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0312 million USD per square kilometre 0.0476 million USD per square kilometre 0.0164 million USD per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0554 million USD per square kilometre 0.0336 million USD per square kilometre 0.0218 million USD per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 0.099 million USD per square kilometre 0.0935 million USD per square kilometre 0.0055 million USD per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 0.1313 million USD per square kilometre 0.1504 million USD per square kilometre 0.0191 million USD per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre, North Macedonia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.1581 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1551 million USD per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre between North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.003 million USD per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do North Macedonia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre?
North Macedonia ranks 93rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 91st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/north-macedonia/sao-tome-and-principe/">North Macedonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.