Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
0.0038 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0039 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
182nd
Namibia rank
180th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Namibia
00.0020.0040.0060.008197019962023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 182nd and Namibia ranks 180th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 182nd and Namibia ranks 180th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/namibia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.