Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0466 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.0471 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
135th
Pakistan rank
134th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Pakistan
00.10.20.30.4197019962023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0471 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0466 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th and Pakistan ranks 134th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0084 million USD per square kilometre 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0153 million USD per square kilometre 0.0073 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.0986 million USD per square kilometre 0.0273 million USD per square kilometre 0.0713 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.1714 million USD per square kilometre 0.0502 million USD per square kilometre 0.1212 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0376 million USD per square kilometre 0.0533 million USD per square kilometre 0.0157 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.0471 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0466 million USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan?
0.0005 million USD per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Pakistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th and Pakistan ranks 134th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/pakistan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Pakistan: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.