Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre

Brazil
0.043 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0466 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
138th
Equatorial Guinea rank
135th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.10.20.30.4197019962023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0466 million USD per square kilometre against 0.043 million USD per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 138th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0052 million USD per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.0139 million USD per square kilometre 0.008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0059 million USD per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.0211 million USD per square kilometre 0.0986 million USD per square kilometre 0.0775 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0477 million USD per square kilometre 0.1714 million USD per square kilometre 0.1237 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0374 million USD per square kilometre 0.0376 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre, Brazil or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0466 million USD per square kilometre against 0.043 million USD per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre between Brazil and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0036 million USD per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Equatorial Guinea?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 138th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/equatorial-guinea/">Brazil vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.