Belarus vs Iceland: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0774 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0751 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
112th
Iceland rank
115th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Iceland
00.050.10.15197019962023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0774 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0751 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 112th and Iceland ranks 115th of 194 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0204 million USD per square kilometre 0.0155 million USD per square kilometre 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0453 million USD per square kilometre 0.0359 million USD per square kilometre 0.0094 million USD per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0973 million USD per square kilometre 0.0361 million USD per square kilometre 0.0613 million USD per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0756 million USD per square kilometre 0.062 million USD per square kilometre 0.0136 million USD per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre, Belarus or Iceland?
Belarus, at 0.0774 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0751 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre between Belarus and Iceland?
0.0023 million USD per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 112th and Iceland ranks 115th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Iceland: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/iceland/">Belarus vs Iceland: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.