Bahamas vs China: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Bahamas
29.08
in 2019
China
30.2
in 2019
Bahamas rank
6th
China rank
5th
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Bahamas
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 30.2 against 29.08 in Bahamas, a difference of 1.12.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 6th and China ranks 5th of 173 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6.93 | 2.02 | 4.91 | Bahamas |
| 1980s | 12.4 | 2.45 | 9.95 | Bahamas |
| 1990s | 20.21 | 4.1 | 16.12 | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 27.88 | 13.83 | 14.05 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 28.7 | 26.95 | 1.75 | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Bahamas or China?
- China, at 30.2 against 29.08 in Bahamas as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Bahamas and China?
- 1.12, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and China?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and China rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Bahamas ranks 6th and China ranks 5th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.