Namibia vs Zambia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Namibia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 21.6% against 21.5% in Namibia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Namibia ranks 105th and Zambia ranks 104th of 181 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.3% | 31.9% | 7.6% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 19.3% | 26.3% | 7.0% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Namibia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 21.6% against 21.5% in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Namibia and Zambia?
- 0.1%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Namibia ranks 105th and Zambia ranks 104th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.