Cuba vs Libya: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Cuba
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 14.3% against 12.8% in Cuba, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 162nd and Libya ranks 159th of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.0% | 12.6% | 1.4% | Cuba |
| 2000s | 9.7% | 16.2% | 6.5% | Libya |
| 2010s | 9.0% | 17.8% | 8.8% | Libya |
| 2020s | 11.5% | 12.7% | 1.2% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Cuba or Libya?
- Libya, at 14.3% against 12.8% in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Cuba and Libya?
- 1.5%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Libya rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Cuba ranks 162nd and Libya ranks 159th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.