Cuba vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Cuba
- Eritrea
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 12.8% against 12.6% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 163rd and Eritrea ranks 164th of 181 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.5% | 26.1% | 14.6% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 9.7% | 20.2% | 10.5% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 8.2% | 12.5% | 4.3% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Cuba or Eritrea?
- Cuba, at 12.8% against 12.6% in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Cuba and Eritrea?
- 0.2%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eritrea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Cuba and Eritrea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Cuba ranks 163rd and Eritrea ranks 164th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.