Poland vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Poland
- Sweden
How they compare
Poland currently reports 176.33 billion current US$ against 168.78 billion current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 7.55 billion current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sweden ahead.
Poland ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 23rd of 179 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.17 billion current US$ | 55.45 billion current US$ | 20.28 billion current US$ | Sweden |
| 2000s | 65.27 billion current US$ | 83.56 billion current US$ | 18.28 billion current US$ | Sweden |
| 2010s | 100.72 billion current US$ | 125.07 billion current US$ | 24.35 billion current US$ | Sweden |
| 2020s | 136.77 billion current US$ | 151.18 billion current US$ | 14.41 billion current US$ | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Poland or Sweden?
- Poland, at 176.33 billion current US$ against 168.78 billion current US$ in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Poland and Sweden?
- 7.55 billion current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Poland and Sweden rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Poland ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 23rd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.