Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Zambia
9,808 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8,972 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia rank
156th
Zimbabwe rank
157th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 9,808 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,972 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 836 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.

Zambia ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 177 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Zambia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 10,353 current US$ per square kilometre 6,659 current US$ per square kilometre 3,694 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 8,852 current US$ per square kilometre 7,917 current US$ per square kilometre 934.32 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Zambia or Zimbabwe?
Zambia, at 9,808 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,972 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
836 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Zambia ranks 156th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/zambia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/zambia/zimbabwe/">Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.