Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Suriname
10,216 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Zimbabwe
8,972 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
155th
Zimbabwe rank
157th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,972 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,244 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 177 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 8,834 current US$ per square kilometre 966.62 current US$ per square kilometre 7,867 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre 5,298 current US$ per square kilometre 4,918 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Suriname, at 10,216 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,972 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
1,244 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.