Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre

Macau, China
202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
155.73 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre against 155.73 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 46.46 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Macau, China ahead.

Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 177 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 18.06 million current US$ per square kilometre 11.78 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 67.91 million current US$ per square kilometre 38.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 29.55 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 103.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 51.35 million current US$ per square kilometre 52.25 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 256.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 113.81 million current US$ per square kilometre 142.70 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 196.22 million current US$ per square kilometre 134.94 million current US$ per square kilometre 61.28 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre, Macau, China or Singapore?
Macau, China, at 202.19 million current US$ per square kilometre against 155.73 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre between Macau, China and Singapore?
46.46 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 9,727 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.